Seriously?
Via
HuffPo:
Muslims worldwide have recently joined together to
celebrate Mawlid al-Nabi, the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad. This day
is an opportunity for Muslims and non-Muslims, such as myself – a
Catholic – to reflect upon the life and legacy of the prophet of Islam.
In this short essay, I want to share with you what I have learned about
Muhammad and how his legacy informs my understanding of Islam.
Muhammad’s beliefs on how to treat religious minorities make him a
universal champion of human rights, particularly as it pertains to
freedom of conscience, freedom of worship, and the right for minorities
to have protection during times of strife.
Here is how it has been reported Muhammad treated some of those religious minorities he defeated.
Magnanimity or moderation are nowhere discernible as features in the
conduct of Mahomet towards such of his enemies as failed to tender a
timely allegiance. Over the bodies of the Coreish who fell at Badr, he
exulted with savage satisfaction; and several prisoners,—accused of no
crime but that of scepticism and political opposition,—were deliberately
executed at his command. The Prince of Kheibar, after being subjected
to inhuman torture for the purpose of discovering the treasures of his
tribe, was, with his cousin, put to death on the pretext of having
treacherously concealed them: and his wife was led away captive to the
tent of the conqueror. Sentence of exile was enforced by Mahomet with
rigorous severity on two whole Jewish tribes at Medîna; and of a third,
likewise his neighbours, the women and children were sold into distant
captivity, while the men, amounting to several hundreds, were butchered
in cold blood before his eyes. ... The perfidious attack at Nakhla,
where the first blood in the internecine war with the Coreish was shed,
although at first disavowed by Mahomet for its scandalous breach of the
sacred usages of Arabia, was eventually justified by a pretended
revelation. ... The pretext on which the Bani Nadhîr were besieged and
expatriated (namely, that Gabriel had revealed their design against the
prophet’s life,) was feeble and unworthy of an honest cause. When Medîna
was beleagured by the confederate army, Mahomet sought the services of
Nueim, a traitor, and employed him to sow distrust among the enemy by
false and treacherous reports; “for,” said he, “what else is War but a
game at deception?” ... And what is perhaps worst of all, the dastardly
assassination of political and religious opponents, countenanced and
frequently directed as they were in all their cruel and perfidious
details by Mahomet himself, leaves a dark and indelible blot upon his
character.[59]