Short Flashback: Susan Rice on political espionage: I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS (March 2017)

The Benghazi liar strikes again.

Friday Flashback Video: Susan Rice on Benghazi "This was a spontaneous reaction to a Video"

Liar, liar, pants on fire...

Video: Susan Rice Laughs Uncontrollably When Charlie Rose Mentions Ukraine's 'Humiliating' Retreat

What kind of happy pills is she on?

Professional liar Susan Rice gets slammed on Twitter...

 

@AmbassadorRice Come on, between us - did you have a straight face when you typed this? #TruthForum
— Chris Tsotsoros (@ctsotsoros) October 31, 2014

@stockdemons @AmbassadorRice she'll say whatever they tell her to say.  No morals - she'll lie and lie Even on Sunday. 5 shows. #Benghazi
— Wantmycountryback (@TLCr2) October 31, 2014

Chickenshit to bullshit. RT RT @AmbassadorRice: U.S.-Israel security relationship is stronger than it has ever been @Cameron_Gray
— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) October 31, 2014

@AmbassadorRice I'd give that statement 5 Pinocchio's
— Charles_S_Viar (@Charles_S_Viar) October 31, 2014

Susan Rice tells another whopper...

Susan Rice can't stop lying. I suspect this is why Obama likes her so much.

Colleville-sur-Mer, France (CNN) – Defending President Barack Obama’s foreign policy as one of global leadership – rather than the passive stance his critics portray – National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Friday the United States was taking important steps in Syria by offering both “lethal and non-lethal” aid to the moderate opposition fighting a bloody civil war.
Critics have cited Obama’s record in Syria as evidence of a failed foreign policy, saying his decision to forgo air strikes after Assad deployed chemical weapons displayed weakness to rivals.
Rice countered those claims by pointing to still-strong alliances between the U.S. and partner nations.
“I don’t think the criticism has been fair,” she said. “I think the fact of the matter is we’re living in complex times, there are many different challenges that the United States and the world faces. But our leadership is unmatched. Our role is indispensable.”

Spin: Susan Rice claims they negotiated with government of Qatar for Berdahl release, not the Taliban...

This woman is an embarrassment. She has no scruples or credibility.

Susan Rice when asked if there are more Benghazi secrets, “Dang if I know,”

This woman is too stupid to be the president’s national security adviser. She parroted false talking points on 5 national news shows and hasn't apparently asked any questions since. 

Via Daily Caller:

Former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice, who served as the Obama administration’s mouthpiece after the Benghazi attacks in September 2012, suggested Wednesday that there’s nothing left to learn about the White House’s response to the attacks — telling a reporter “dang if I know” whether the Republican investigation will unearth more evidence of a coverup.

Rice, now the president’s national security advisor, appeared Wednesday morning at the Women’s Foreign Policy Group in Washington, D.C. Rice had earlier made a joke alluding to the harm the Benghazi scandal caused to her career, prompting PBS journalist Judy Woodruff to ask about Republicans’ new allegations. [...]

But Woodruff pressed on, asking her what the American people can expect to be revealed as part of the House select committee on Benghazi. “What more is there that the administration has done or said that we’re not aware of?” she asked.

“Dang if I know,” Rice boldly declared. “I mean, honestly. We — the administration has produced, I think, 25,000 pages of documents or 25,000 individual documents. They have supported, participated in, contributed to the investigation of seven, I think, different committees.”

Keep on reading…

CIA confirmed there was no Benghazi protest one day before Susan Rice misled the American people...

I am being nice when I use the term "misled."

Via The Washington Times: 

Before the Obama administration gave an inaccurate narrative on national television that the Benghazi attacks grew from an anti-American protest, the CIA’s station chief in Libya pointedly told his superiors in Washington that no such demonstration occurred, documents and interviews with current and former intelligence officials show.

The attack was “not an escalation of protests,” the station chief wrote to then-Deputy CIA Director Michael J. Morell in an email dated Sept. 15, 2012 — a full day before the White House sent Susan E. Rice to several Sunday talk shows to disseminate talking points claiming that the Benghazi attack began as a protest over an anti-Islam video.
That the talking points used by Mrs. Rice, who was then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, were written by a CIA that ignored the assessment by its own station chief inside Libya, has emerged as one of the major bones of contention in the more than two years of political fireworks and congressional investigations into the Benghazi attack.

Susan Rice: "nobody in the Obama administration intended to mislead the American people" about Benghazi attack

Susan Rice has no credibility and no regrets...

Via Politico:

National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Sunday that she has no regrets about her now-infamous round of TV interviews in 2012 about the Benghazi attacks.
Rice, appearing on “Meet the Press,” said that nobody in the Obama administration intended to mislead the American people when she appeared on Fox, ABC, CNN, NBC and CBS in 2012 shortly after the attacks.
Asked by host David Gregory if she had any regrets about those five television interviews she did shortly after the Benghazi attacks, Rice replied: “No.”
“Because what I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best information that we had at the time,” Rice said. “The information I provided, which I explained to you, was what we had at the moment.  It could change.  I commented that this was based on what we knew on that morning, was provided to me and my colleagues, and indeed, to Congress, by the intelligence community.  And that’s been well validated in many different ways since.”
“And that information turned out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct.  But the notion that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people is patently false.  And I think that that’s been amply demonstrated,” Rice said.

No Regrets: Susan Rice calls Benghazi a "False controversy"

Lying to the American people is standard procedure in the Obama administration. 

Amusing: National Security Adviser Susan Rice is hard at work...

Cleaning Joe Biden's suit...

Natl Sec Adv Susan E. Rice cleans a stain on VP Joe Biden's suitcoat today pic.twitter.com/WWCAVZhSBs
— petesouza (@petesouza) August 2, 2013

At least she doesn't ave to lie on all major networks about this job...

Woman too stupid to realize Benghazi attack wasn't about YouTube to be named NSA adviser...

Either Susan Rice is stupid, incompetent or a liar. Either way, she is unqualified to be Obama's national security adviser. 

Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador who drew criticism for her initial account of the Benghazi terror attack, has been named as national security adviser, a senior White House official confirmed to Fox News.

Rice will replace Tom Donilon, who is resigning from the post. Rice, the current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, does not need Senate confirmation for the job.

The ambassador had earlier been considered in the running for the secretary of State post, which does require confirmation, but withdrew from consideration amid the continuing fallout over her role following the Benghazi attack.

Rice went on five Sunday shows after the attack and claimed it was triggered by protests over an anti-Islam film, an explanation many lawmakers said at the time was inaccurate.

Obama pimping Susan Rice for national security adviser?

Benghazi Susan may ride again...

Via The Washington Post:

UNITED NATIONS — Susan E. Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations who lost out in a bruising bid for the job of secretary of state, may have the last laugh.

Rice has emerged as far and away the front-runner to succeed Thomas E. Donilon as President Obama’s national security adviser later this year, according to an administration official familiar with the president’s thinking. The job would place her at the nexus of foreign-policy decision making and allow her to rival the influence of Secretary of State John F. Kerry in shaping the president’s foreign policy.

The appointment would mark a dramatic twist of fortune for Rice, whose prospects to become the country’s top diplomat fizzled last year after a round of television appearances in which she provided what turned out to be a flawed account of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

Keep on reading…

Liberal Heartache: Susan Rice withdraws from consideration of Secretary for State job...

And I was so looking forward to her Senate confirmation hearings...

Via FOX News:

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice has removed her name from consideration for secretary of state, saying she does not want to put the administration through a "lengthy, disruptive and costly" confirmation process.

The move followed weeks of controversy on Capitol Hill over the possibility of her nomination, with Republicans threatening to block Rice from the post over concerns about her September comments on the Libya terror attack. Some lawmakers continue to charge that Rice misled the American people when she said on Sept. 16 that the attack was the result of a "spontaneous" demonstration spun out of control.

President Obama, in a written statement Thursday, called those claims "unfair and misleading" but said he accepts her decision. 

Obama loses Maureen Dowd over defense of Susan Rice

Wow!  Maureen Dowd threw Susan Rice completely under the bus in this opinion piece and gave Obama a slap too.

[snip] Rice was given the toned-down talking points, but she has access to classified information. Though she told Bob Schieffer on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that the extremist elements could have included Qaeda affiliates or Al Qaeda itself, she mostly used her appearances to emphasize the story line of the spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Muslim video. She disputed the contention of the president of Libya’s General National Congress, who called the attack “preplanned” when he talked to Schieffer just before Rice.[...]

An Africa expert, Rice should have realized that when a gang showed up with R.P.G.’s and mortars in a place known as a hotbed of Qaeda sympathizers and Islamic extremist training camps, it was not anger over a movie. She should have been savvy enough to wonder why the wily Hillary was avoiding the talk shows. 

The president’s fierce defense of Rice had virile flare. But he might have been better off leaving it to aides, so he did not end up going mano a mano with his nemesis John McCain on an appointment he hasn’t even made (though now Obama might feel compelled to, just to prove that he can’t be pushed around), and so he could focus on fiscal cliff bipartisanship. 

His argument that Rice “had nothing to do with Benghazi,” raises the question: Then why was she the point person? 

The president’s protecting a diplomatic damsel in distress made Rice look more vulnerable, when her reason for doing those shows in the first place was to look more venerable. Keep on reading...