USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times "Daybreak" poll
Showing posts with label LA Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LA Times. Show all posts
Saturday, November 5, 2016
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
Monday, October 17, 2016
Monday, October 10, 2016
Friday, September 30, 2016
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Monday, October 7, 2013
LA Times refuses to print letter that disagree with their liberal version of facts...
This is why the LA Times is a propaganda outlet, not a journalistic newspaper...
Via Newsbuters:
Via Newsbuters:
It’s one thing for a news outlet to advance the as yet unproven theory of anthropogenic global warming; it’s quite another to admit that you won’t publish views that oppose it.
As amazing as it may same, that’s exactly what the Los Angeles Times did Saturday in an article by editorial writer Jon Healey:
Regular readers of The Times’ Opinion pages will know that, among the few letters published over the last week that have blamed the Democrats for the government shutdown (a preponderance faulted House Republicans), none made the argument about Congress exempting itself from Obamacare.
Why? Simply put, this objection to the president’s healthcare law is based on a falsehood, and letters that have an untrue basis (for example, ones that say there’s no sign humans have caused climate change) do not get printed.
Keep on reading…
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Liberal LA Times bans term illegal immigrants undocumented immigrants...
The LA Times is one of the most Democratic Party supporting papers in the country. no wo9nder democrats are freaking out about the possibility the Koch Brothers might buy the struggling paper...
Via LA Times:
Via LA Times:
The Los Angeles Times has announced new guidelines for covering immigration.
The goal is to “provide relevance and context and to avoid labels.”
That means stories will no longer refer to individuals as “illegal immigrants” or “undocumented immigrants,” but instead will describe a person’s circumstances.
A memo from The Times’ Standards and Practices Committee announcing the change explains the move away from labels:
” ‘Illegal immigrants’ is overly broad and does not accurately apply in every situation. The alternative suggested by the 1995 guidelines, ‘undocumented immigrants,’ similarly falls short of our goal of precision. It is also untrue in many cases, as with immigrants who possess passports or other documentation but lack valid visas.”
Though this is a change in written guidelines, the philosophy is already in practice in The Times.
Keep reading…
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







