Showing posts with label Paul Krugman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Krugman. Show all posts

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Flashback to 2011: NYT's Paul Krugman touts the VA as socialized medicine that works...

Krugman was wrong as usual...

Via NY Times:
Many people still have an image of veterans’ health care based on the terrible state of the system two decades ago. Under the Clinton administration, however, the V.H.A. was overhauled, and achieved a remarkable combination of rising quality and successful cost control. Multiple surveys have found the V.H.A. providing better care than most Americans receive, even as the agency has held cost increases well below those facing Medicare and private insurers. Furthermore, the V.H.A. has led the way in cost-saving innovation, especially the use of electronic medical records.
What’s behind this success? Crucially, the V.H.A. is an integrated system, which provides health care as well as paying for it. So it’s free from the perverse incentives created when doctors and hospitals profit from expensive tests and procedures, whether or not those procedures actually make medical sense. And because V.H.A. patients are in it for the long term, the agency has a stronger incentive to invest in prevention than private insurers, many of whose customers move on after a few years.
And yes, this is “socialized medicine” — although some private systems, like Kaiser Permanente, share many of the V.H.A.’s virtues. But it works — and suggests what it will take to solve the troubles of U.S. health care more broadly.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Has Paul Krugman's cheese finally slipped completely off his cracker?

Many believe Liberalism is a Mental Disorder. Paul Krugman is now advocating for a fake alien invasion to force more government spending on liberal projects.
.
PAUL KRUGMAN, NEW YORK TIMES: This is hard to get people to do, much better, obviously, to build bridges and roads and healthcare clinics and schools. But my proposed, I actually have a serious proposal which is that we have to get a bunch of scientists to tell us that we’re facing a threatened alien invasion, and in order to be prepared for that alien invasion we have to do things like build high-speed rail. And the, once we’ve recovered, we can say, “Look, there were no aliens.”
But look, I mean, whatever it takes because right now we need somebody to spend, and that somebody has to be the U.S. government.

Friday, May 18, 2012

NYT’s Paul Krugman: Republicans Are “Manchurian Candidates” Who Want To “Bring Down America”

Did Paul Krugman get a Nobel Prize in Stupidity?



On Friday’s Live With Martin Bashir, New York Times economic columnist and Nobel LaureatePaul Krugman added new dimensions to the art of hyperbolic overstatement when he wondered aloud whether the GOP in Congress wholly consisted of moles attempting to “bring down America” from within. [...]
When asked by Bashir if House Majority Leader Rep. John Boehner was working to “further undermine America’s standing” in his efforts to insist that the debt ceiling not be raised again without accompanying spending cuts, Krugman agreed and said “Sometimes you do wonder if these guys are moles — Manchurian Candidates — for I don’t know who.”
Keep on reading…

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Paul Krugman doubles down on crazy


The moonbat runs deep in this one.
(NY Times) — It looks as if I should say a bit more about yesterday’s anniversary. So:
The fact is that the two years or so after 9/11 were a terrible time in America — a time of political exploitation and intimidation, culminating in the deliberate misleading of the nation into the invasion of Iraq. It’s probably worth pointing out that I’m not saying anything now that I wasn’t saying in real time back then, when Bush had a sky-high approval rating and any criticism was denounced as treason. And there’s nothing I’ve done in my life of which I’m more proud.

It was a time when tough talk was confused with real heroism, when people who made speeches, then feathered their own political or financial nests, were exalted along with — and sometimes above — those who put their lives on the line, both on the evil day and after.

So it was a shameful episode in our nation’s history — and it’s one that I can’t help thinking about whenever we talk about 9/11 itself.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Shameful: Paul Krugman accuses Bush, Giuliani of being "fake heroes" who cashed in on 9-11


Former President Bush and former NY Mayor Giuliani rallied us in the aftermath of 9/11. Krugman's vile attack on the 10 year anniversary may be the most shameful thing an alleged journalist has ever done. (accent is mine)
(New York Slimes)- What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. Te atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Krugman suggests "Death Panels" and VAT to balance the budget

Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman is recommending "Death Panels" and a VAT tax as needed measures to balance the budget. Sarah Palin tried to warn America...



Via NewsBusters:
CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, HOST: But what is going to happen? I mean, are you clear on where a compromise is going to be? It's got to be discussed before the end of the year, no?

KRUGMAN: No. Some years down the pike, we're going to get the real solution, which is going to be a combination of death panels and sales taxes. It's going to be that we're actually going to take Medicare under control, and we're going to have to get some additional revenue, probably from a VAT. But it's not going to happen now.

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Peer Reviewed Study: Paul Krugman is Nation's Most Partisan Economist


This peer reviewed study posted in Econ Journal Watch is hardly a shocker for anyone who has paid attention to Paul Krugman's morphing economic positions. Krugman has actually contradicted his own findings to make Republicans look bad.

NewsBusters
reported:
Most economists are not susceptible to partisanship in their work, a new scholarly study finds. But anyone who reads Paul Krugman's columns in the New York Times will hardly be surprised to learn he is a glaring exception to the study's findings.

He consistently changes his fiscal views depending on the party in power.

"Krugman has changed his tune in a significant way regarding the budget deficit when the White House has changed party," found Brett Barkley, an economics student at George Mason University....

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Paul Krugman Admits Obamacare Includes Death Panels and They are Money Savers

Democrats ridiculed the the idea Obamacare would create death panels for the elderly. Now that Obamacare has passed, Leftie Paul Krugman is touting the savings of those death panels.

From RadioVice:
PAUL KRUGMAN, NEW YORK TIMES: Think about people on the right. They’re simultaneously screaming, they’re going to send all of the old people to death panels and it’s not going to save any money. That’s a contradictory point of view.

TAPPER: Death panels would save money, theoretically.

KRUGMAN: The advisory path has the ability to make more or less binding judgments on saying this particular expensive treatment actually doesn’t do any good medically and so we’re not going to pay for it. That is actually going to save quite a lot of money. We don’t know how much yet. The CBO gives it very little credit. But most of the health care economists I talk to think it’s going to be a really major cost saving.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Paul Krugman: Rangel Ethics Issue "Has No National Significance"

Paul Krugman wishes Charles Rangel would 'go away," but doesn't think his ethics problems are of any "national significance." When the head of the House tax writing committee has been admonished for accepting i8nappropriate trips and is under investigation for being a tax cheat, that is significant out here in fly-over country.

From the video:
GEORGE WILL, ABC NEWS: To know Charlie Rangel is to like him. Wonderful spirit and all that. Still, one has to wonder. Suppose a Republican had revised his disclosure form and suddenly his net worth doubled and he came upon not one but two checking accounts with $500,000 in them. I mean, there comes a point at which the tax writing committee be headed by someone without the...

ELIZABETH VARGAS, ABC NEWS: And Speaker Pelosi and Steny Hoyer were all calling for Tom DeLay to relinquish his post when he was also admonished by the ethics committee.

PAUL KRUGMAN, NEW YORK TIMES: Yeah, this is, you know, it is worth pointing out that none of these things actually seem to affect national policy. When Billy Townsend, when Billy Tauzin basically wrote the drug, the Medicare drug bill, then left to become head of the pharmaceutical lobby, that was much more serious, but it didn't actually violate House ethics rules. So, yeah, I'm unhappy with this. I wish Rangel would go away, but it's, it really has no national significance.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Paul Krugman about Climategate: "There's Not A Single Smoking Gun In There" (video)


Krugman appears ignorant of the actual contents of the leaked emails. There is clearly a smoking gun. Krugman wouldn't recognize a smoking gun if he had a flaming howitzer stuck up his butt.


From the video:
Krugman: "All those e-mails, people have never seen what academic discussion looks like, there's not a single smoking gun in there, there's nothing in there, the travesty is people are not able to explain why the fact that 1998 was a very warm year, doesn't actually mean that global warming has stopped"