Friday, April 2, 2010

Billboards Against Obama Pop Up in Atlanta

A new website is selling digital billboard ads against Obama in Atlanta. Billboards Against Obama is selling the billboard space for $2,500 to $3,500 a month.



ATLANTA -- One group is taking freedom of speech and freedom of expression to the limits...

The billboards are the latest move to sway public opinion ...

The group behind the billboards call themselves BillboardsAgainstObama.com.

Here are some sample billboard messages.


Oh My! Demo Rep. Phil Hare on ObamaCare: ‘I Don’t Worry About the Constitution’

Rep. Phil Hare (D-IL) is foolish enough to speak the truth about how Democrats view the constitutionality of Obamacare.
‘I Don’t Worry About the Constitution’



Hopefully, voters in the 17th Congressional District of Illinois can renew Rep. Phil Hare's interest in the Constitution this November.

Florida Doctor Posts Sign Telling Obama Voters to Go Elsewhere


Doctors can't discriminate on the basis of race, religion or any other protected status, but political preference is not one of the legally protected categories. A Florida Urologist has posted a sign telling Barack Obama voters to go elsewhere.
A doctor who considers the national health-care overhaul to be bad medicine for the country posted a sign on his office door telling patients who voted for President Barack Obama to seek care "elsewhere."

"I'm not turning anybody away — that would be unethical," Dr. Jack Cassell...

The sign reads: "If you voted for Obama…seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your healthcare begin right now, not in four years."

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Americans Abandon Democrat Label

Less Americans are willing to identify themselves as Democrats. According to this USA Today Poll, the number of Americans calling themselves Democrats is in sharp decline. Republicans are on a slight uptick, but the biggest difference is the number who are now claiming the Independent label.



The same poll found 50% say President Obama does not deserve re-election.
• Fifty percent say Obama doesn't deserve re-election, and 26% say he deserves "a great deal" of the blame for the nation's economic problems, double the percentage in July.

Obama Ridicules Polls Showing Nation Hates ObamaCare

Barack Obama:
"It just happened last week! It's only been a week! Can you imagine if some of these reporters were working on a farm and you planted some seeds and they came out next day and they looked -- 'Nothing's happened! There's no crop! We're going to starve! Oh no! It's a disaster!' It's been a week, folks."

Demo Rep. Hank Johnson: Excuse me, but the island of Guam is getting ready to capsize

Rep. Johnson must be suffering from a mental disability. At least, he has an excuse for voting for Obamacare.

Does Obama Really Want to Drill, Baby, Drill?


If you listen to the hoopla on network and cable news you might get that impression. A closer examination reveals there isn't a lot of immediate change in President Obama's position. Here is a NYT's report of the announced change.
The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.

The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.

Opening up 167 million acres of ocean to drilling certainly sounds like a huge change in Obama's position. Less than a month ago, the Obama administration quietly killed new offshore drilling for the next three years by continuing a moratorium on new leases. Has President Obama really become concerned about America's energy costs and foreign dependency? What is the real effect of this change? Power Line has this analysis.
When you cut through the hoopla, here is what Obama's announcement added up to:

* Cancelled five lease sales off the Alaska coast that were planned over the next 2 years. One of the areas is estimated to hold up to 77 billion barrels of oil, or more than 3 times US reserves.

* A study of the southern Atlantic OCS, with the findings due back next year....no leasing.

* Delayed a planned lease sale off Virginia until at least 2012.

It doesn't look like much of anything is going to happen until the next Presidential election cycle. By then, Obama will be a 'lame duck' or we will have a Republican President. If Obama is a 'lame duck,' he can flip-flop on the issue again without worrying about voter repercussions. If he loses, a Republican President will likely open up more areas for drilling anyway. Since this angered his base, why did President Obama make this announcement when it will have so little effect over the next two years? Raw politics is behind this move. New CAFE regulations raising average mileage to 35 miles per gallon by 2016 and costing consumers $1300 a vehicle are going into effect. The CAFE increases step-by-step starting next year. Also, President Obama is going to press for Senate passage of Cap and Trade. He needs a couple GOP Senators to break a likely filibuster. The potential of additional oil drilling is the carrot.

How Come Democratic Districts Received Two-And-A-Half Times More Stimulus Dollars


The stimulus was supposed to be about creating jobs. You would thinks more money would be spent in high unemployment districts. An analysis of data from Recovery.gov shows that isn't true. The leading factor determining where the most money goes seems to be politics. Democratic districts received two-and-a-half times more stimulus dollars than Republican districts. Democrats need to explain this discrepancy.

From NRO:
Controlling for the percentage of the district employed in the construction industry, a proxy for the vulnerability to recession of a district, I find no statistical correlation for all relevant unemployment indicators and the allocation of funds. This suggests that unemployment is not the factor leading the awards. Also, I found no correlation between other economic indicators, such as income, and stimulus funding.

Second: On average, Democratic districts received one-and-a-half times as many awards as Republican ones. Democratic districts also received two-and-a-half times more stimulus dollars than Republican districts ($122,127,186,509 vs. $46,139,592,268)...