Showing posts with label nuclear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nuclear. Show all posts

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Harry Reid goes nuclear...

Democrats will regret this when Republicans control the Senate and White House...

Via Fox News:
Senate Democrats bowled over Republicans on Thursday to win approval for a highly controversial rule change which would limit the GOP's ability to block nominees, in a move Republicans called a "raw power grab."
"It's a sad day in the history of the Senate," Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said after the vote.
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., moving quickly following days of speculation, used the so-called "nuclear option" to pass the change. Typically, major changes like this take 67 votes, but he did it with just a simple majority.
With Republicans fuming, the change weakens the power of the minority to stall nominations for top positions. Instead of needing 60 votes to break a filibuster, the change means Democrats will now need just 51.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

North Korea performs nuclear bomb test...

Time for Obama to fire off a sternly worded letter...
SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea conducted its third nuclear test on Tuesday in defiance of existing U.N. resolutions, angering the United States and Japan and prompting its only major ally, China, to call for calm.

The North said the test had "greater explosive force" than the 2006 and 2009 tests that were widely seen as small-scale. Its KCNA news agency said it had used a "miniaturized" and lighter nuclear device, indicating that it had again used plutonium which is more suitable for use as a missile warhead.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, the third of his line to rule the country, has presided over two long-range rocket launches and a nuclear test during his first a year in power, pursuing policies that have propelled his impoverished and malnourished country closer to becoming a nuclear weapons power.

U.S. President Barack Obama labeled the test a "highly provocative act" that hurt regional stability and he and other states that are members of U.N. Security Council pressed for new sanctions on the isolated country.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Obama administration on Iran: “We’re not setting deadlines.”


I guess it's time for Obama to send Iran another sternly worded letter...

 Via Bloomberg:
The U.S. is “not setting deadlines” for Iran and still considers negotiations as “by far the best approach” to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.

While Clinton said in an interview yesterday that economic sanctions are building pressure on Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last week the sanctions aren’t slowing Iran’s nuclear advances “because it doesn’t see a clear red line from the international community.”

Asked if the Obama administration will lay out sharper “red lines” for Iran or state explicitly the consequences of failing to negotiate a deal with world powers by a certain date, Clinton said, “We’re not setting deadlines.”

“We’re watching very carefully about what they do, because it’s always been more about their actions than their words,” Clinton said in the interview with Bloomberg Radio after wrapping up meetings at an Asia-Pacific forum in Vladivostok, Russia.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Obama In No Rush To Make a Decision On What To Do About Iran Nuke Program


President Obama doesn't have a problem kicking this can down the road. He never liked Israel anyway.
(The Hill) — The White House won’t be rushing to make a decision on Iran’s nuclear program, White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday.
While Carney would not respond directly to questions about whether President Obama would have to decide within a year whether to use military force against Iran to stop it from obtaining nuclear weapons, he did say Obama’s policy is “clear.” [...]
Asked whether Panetta’s view puts a timetable on Obama, Carney said: “It doesn’t change our strategy, which is to continue to put pressure, continue to isolate, continue to make clear to Iran what its options are.”
Obama has said the United States wants to resolve the nuclear issue with Iran diplomatically. The United States and European Union have both imposed economic sanctions against Iran’s oil exports, prompting Iran to threaten to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil passageway in the Persian Gulf.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Obama on Romney's claim Iran will get nukes if Obama is re-elected: "...Not going to comment..."

 This must be another one of those questions that are above Obama's pay grade.



Via Freedom's Lighthouse:
Obama was asked about Gov. Mitt Romney’s statement in the GOP Debate Saturday night that if President Obama is re-elected, it’s a virtual lock that Iran will obtain Nuclear Weapons. Obama would not answer, saying he is going to refrain from responding to what is said in Republican Debates “until they have an actual nominee.”

Monday, November 7, 2011

Will Obama be the President who allows Iran the nuclear bomb?

The bribes and ineffective sanctions have failed. Iran is months away from acquiring a nuclear bomb.
Iran has already acquired the knowledge, technology, and resources to create a nuclear bomb within months, according to Western experts who were briefed on the intelligence information due to be released in this week's report by the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency.

According to the experts, Iranian scientists acquired the knowledge with the help of weapons scientists from Russia, Pakistan and North Korea.

Candidate Senator Barack Obama pledged to stop Iran from getting the nuclear bomb and claimed he knew how to deal with rogue states. Back in 2010 a secret Gates memo warned the Obama administration has no strategy for a nuclear armed Iran.
Several officials said the highly classified analysis, written in January to President Obama’s national security adviser, Gen. James L. Jones, touched off an intense effort inside the Pentagon, the White House and the intelligence agencies to develop new options for Mr. Obama. They include a revised set of military alternatives, still under development, to be considered should diplomacy and sanctions fail to force Iran to change course…

Pressed on the administration’s ambiguous phrases until now about how close the United States was willing to allow Iran’s program to proceed, a senior administration official described last week in somewhat clearer terms that there was a line Iran would not be permitted to cross.

The official said that the United States would ensure that Iran would not “acquire a nuclear capability,” a step Tehran could get to well before it developed a sophisticated weapon. “That includes the ability to have a breakout,” he said, using the term nuclear specialists apply to a country that suddenly renounces the nonproliferation treaty and uses its technology to build a small arsenal…

Mr. Gates’s memo appears to reflect concerns in the upper echelons of the Pentagon and the military that the White House did not have a well-prepared series of alternatives in place in case all the diplomatic steps finally failed.
Will President Obama support military action against Iran or will he be the President who allows a rogue Islamic state to acquire nuclear weapons?

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Sudden Lead Poisoning Kills Iranian Nuclear Scientist


Darioush Rezaie, 35, a university lecturer, was shot dead by gunmen in eastern Tehran Saturday. (Reuters)

Being an Iranian nuclear scientist is becoming a high hazard occupation.
(BBC News)- An Iranian scientist believed to have links to the country's nuclear programme has been shot dead outside his home in Tehran, Iranian media say.

Isna news agency named him as Daryoush Rezaei, 35, adding that his wife was wounded and rushed to hospital.
In 2010, nuclear scientist Massoud Ali Mohammadi was killed by a remote-controlled bomb in Tehran.
Iran blamed that attack on Israeli secret service Mossad. Israel has long warned about Iran's nuclear programme.

Some reports said the latest attack involved assailants on a motorcycle, who shot him in the neck in front of his house.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Video) Another Explosion at a Japanese Nuke Plant

Can it get any worse for Japan?
TOKYO — Tokyo Electric Power Co. says three workers have been injured and seven are missing after an explosion at the stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant.

Friday, February 4, 2011

Obama Betrays British Nuclear Secrets to Secure Start Treaty?

National Security Implications of U.s. Ratification of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty - Start Ii; Hearing Before the Committee on Armed

This is bad, very bad. What kind of man betrays his closest ally? If this is true, President Obama should be impeached.
start treaty
(Telegraph)The US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

Information about every Trident missile the US supplies to Britain will be given to Russia as part of an arms control deal signed by President Barack Obama next week.

Defence analysts claim the agreement risks undermining Britain’s policy of refusing to confirm the exact size of its nuclear arsenal.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Report: Israel Deploys Nuclear Armed Subs Off Iranian Coast


If this report from Times Online is true, this is a clear and frightening message to Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Three German-built Israeli submarines equipped with nuclear cruise missiles are to be deployed in the Gulf near the Iranian coastline....

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Video: Liz Cheney Nukes Obama's Plans for Disarmament and Appeasement

Liz Cheney is a rising star in the GOP. In this video, she tears into President Obama's nuclear and Iran policies.

Liz Cheney: "President Obama, Stop Apologizing for America and Start Defending Her"

Friday, April 9, 2010

Sarah Palin Fires Back at Obama (video)

Thursday, President Obama criticized Sarah Palin's nuclear acumen:
"I really have no response to that. The last I checked, Sarah Palin is not much of an expert on nuclear issues."

Sarah Palin has fired back.



From Breitbart TV:
"Now, the President, with all the vast nuclear experience he acquired as a community organizer, a part-time Senator and a full-candidate -- all that experience, still, no accomplishment to date with North Korea and Iran."

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Obama promises not to use nukes even in self-defense against a chemical or biological attack


President Obama has indirectly invited our enemies to attack us with chemical or biological weapons by promising to not use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Obama has overruled his own Defense Secretaries initial position on nuclear weapon strategy. Apparently, he believes we possess some 'uber' weaponry his Defense Secretary hasn't been told about.
Those threats, Mr. Obama argued, could be deterred with “a series of graded options,” a combination of old and newly designed conventional weapons.

The NYT
reported:
To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.

Friday, April 2, 2010

Great News! Hugo Chavez Wants Nuke Technology!


Venezuela has 513 billion barrels of oil, twice as much as Saudi Arabia, according to a report released in January, but Hugo Chavez says he wants nuclear technology for when the oil runs out. Of course, Chavez says he doesn't want an atomic bomb. Only Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is dumb enough to believe him.
Chavez said Moscow and Caracas would strengthen security ties to "continue increasing Venezuela's defense capability" and move ahead with cooperation on nuclear energy.

"We are not going to build the atomic bomb but we will develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. We have to prepare for the post-petroleum era," Chavez said on Thursday.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Obama Endorses Nuclear Strike on Americans Health Care


President Obama avoided the term 'reconciliation' in today's health care speech, but the message was clear. Go 'nuclear' with reconciliation.

AP
via Breitbart reported:
President Barack Obama urged Congress Wednesday to vote "up or down" on sweeping health care legislation in the next few weeks, endorsing a plan that denies Senate Republicans the right to kill the bill by stalling with a filibuster.

"I don't see how another year of negotiations would help. Moreover, the insurance companies aren't starting over," Obama said, rejecting Republican calls to begin anew on an effort to remake the health care system.

The president made his appeal as Democratic leaders in Congress surveyed their rank and file for the votes needed to pass legislation by majority vote—invoking rules that deny Senate Republicans the right to block it through endless stalling debate. Obama specifically endorsed that approach.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Is the Military Option Off the Table for Dealing With Iran?


If we take Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's words at face value, Iran has nothing to fear from the US as they race to build a nuclear weapon. Iran has ratcheted up it nuclear program in response to the ineffective sanctions placed on them by the US and other countries. Now, Hillary is signaling the military option is off the table. She might as well told Iran, "Go on and build your nuclear arsenal."

YNET News reported:

"Obviously, we don't want Iran to become a nuclear weapons power, but we are not planning anything other than going for sanctions,"she told al-Arabiya television.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Secret Document Shows Iran Working On Nuclear Trigger


Iran claims their nuclear program is for the peaceful production of energy. However, a leaked intelligence document proves what we knew all along. Iran is working to build a nuclear bomb. The leaked documents describe a four-year plan to test a neutron initiator. This is the component that detonates a nuclear bomb. It has no civilian use.

The Times reported:

The notes, from Iran’s most sensitive military nuclear project, describe a four-year plan to test a neutron initiator, the component of a nuclear bomb that triggers an explosion. Foreign intelligence agencies date them to early 2007, four years after Iran was thought to have suspended its weapons programme.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Is Obama's Iran Policy Collapsing?


Is Obama's Iran Policy Collapsing? Many people are asking this question. Iran is beck-peddling and delaying on the deal they reached in Vienna. They now want a new deal which actually rolls back pre-existing UN sanctions. A senior Western diplomat involved in the Iran negotiations said.
“It’s like Groundhog Day, except in Groundhog Day you wake up every day and everything’s the same. With this, you wake up every day and everything’s just a little bit worse.”

Times Online reported:
Today, however, with just hours until the deadline, Iran has turned the table on its foreign interlocutors with a rival proposal, demanding that it be allowed to buy higher enriched uranium directly from abroad....

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Rangel Prepares to Go Nuclear


House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) put aside his many tax problems and prepared H.R. 3200 for the nuclear option. Rangel held a hearing and certified H.R. 3200 has met all requirements to pass as a “budget reconciliation” measure.
House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) held a hearing this morning to certify that H.R. 3200 -- the main House Obamacare bill which was the subject of all the town hall rage in August -- has met all requirements to pass as a “budget reconciliation” measure.

Under reconciliation, the bill can be passed by a simple majority vote in the Senate -- just 51 votes -- and will be given preferential treatment on the House floor as well. The Dems have apparently invoked the “nuclear option” to shut out Republicans and ensure the bill is passed before the end of the year.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Obama Gives Iran Time to Hide the Evidence Before Inspection


According to former international weapons inspector, David Albright, Iran has time to hide the evidence before the inspection of their formerly secret nuclear site.

From the LA Times:
Allowing access within two weeks of the announcement would in effect give Tehran almost a month after its Sept. 21 acknowledgment of the plant’s existence to obscure evidence, they said.

David Albright, a former international weapons inspector and president of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, said it would probably take Iran some time to conceal activities. But, “if you have a month, you have the time,” he said.