Monday, November 12, 2012

Obama administration to file hundreds of lawsuits accusing businesses of “disparate impact” on minorities...

“Disparate impact” is a code term for failure to have affirmative action up and running. Basically, if the outcome is different for minorities, you can be sued for it even if you did not discriminate against anyone. Barack Obama is an ultra liberal who demands equal outcomes, not equal opportunity. That policy is in place in most liberal arts colleges and is likely how Obama got through college.

Via IBD:
If your organization has a policy or practice that doesn’t benefit minorities equally, watch out: The Obama administration could sue you for racial discrimination under a dubious legal theory that many argue is unconstitutional.
President Obama intends to close “persistent gaps” between whites and minorities in everything from credit scores and homeownership to test scores and graduation rates.
His remedy — short of new affirmative-action legislation — is to sue financial companies, schools and employers based on “disparate impact” complaints — a stealthy way to achieve racial preferences, opposed 2 to 1 by Americans.
Under this broad interpretation of civil-rights law, virtually any organization can be held liable for race bias if it maintains a policy that negatively impacts one racial group more than another — even if it has no racist motive and applies the policy evenly across all groups.
This means that even race-neutral rules for mortgage underwriting and consumer credit scoring potentially can be deemed racist if prosecutors can produce statistics showing they tend to result in adverse outcomes for blacks or Latinos.
Already, Attorney General Eric Holder has used the club of disparate-impact lawsuits to beat almost $500 million in loan set-asides and other claims out of the nation’s largest banks.
Keep reading…

No comments: